HOLDING: Defendant found not liable under the “mode of operation” theory when a patron slips on a phone calling card that was discarded outside of the defendant’s store on the sidewalk. Arroyo v. Durling Realty, LLC, Appellate Division, decided October 23, 2013.

The Appellate Division in the matter of Arroyo v. Durling Realty LLC, found that the mode of operation theory was not applicable in the instance of a plaintiff slipping on a phone calling card that was discarded outside of the defendant’s store on the sidewalk. Rather, the Appellate Division opined that the ordinary principles of premises liability would be applied to the matter.

Read More

 

 



 

 

NJ Law Review Update

Dear Colleagues:

ISSUE:  Is a commercial landlord liable for death due to water-borne Legionnaire’s disease?

The Appellate Division on May 23, 2013, in the matter of Vellucci v. Allstate Insurance Company opined that a commercial landlord has no duty to take proactive measures to insure that a building’s water supply is not contaminated by Legionella bacteria.

 Vellucci is a wrongful death and survivorship action brought by Anthony Vellucci on behalf of his deceased father, Albert Vellucci. The decedent was employed by Allstate Insurance Company and worked in an office located in a commercial office building in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Mack-Cali Realty LP owned the building, designed the building, built the building and managed the building. According to the plaintiff, his father contracted Legionnaire’s disease in December 2004 when he was exposed to water-borne Legionella bacteria in the building’s water supply.

 The defendant Mack-Cali moved for summary judgment arguing that under the circumstances of the case, it was not legally responsible to insure the building’s water supply was free of the bacteria. Mack-Cali did not know or have reason to know of the presence of the bacteria in the building or any of its properties in the northeast United States. Summary Judgment was granted by the trial court. The plaintiff appealed this decision arguing that Mack-Cali is a sophisticated owner/manager of a commercial property, and therefore had a duty to maintain the building’s water supply and plumbing system in a reasonably safe condition.

 The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s granting of summary judgment. The Appellate Division found that the prevailing industry and regulatory standards do not impose a duty on commercial landlords to take proactive measures to insure that the building’s water supply is not contaminated by Legionella bacteria. There is no evidence produced that Mack-Cali actually knew or should have known that the building’s water supply had been contaminated.  There is no statutory regulatory scheme imposing such a duty on owners or managers of commercial office buildings. Further, the plaintiff failed to produce any industry standards requiring same. Moreover, the court found that the decedent’s case was an isolated one and once it became known that Legionella bacteria was in the water system, appropriate measures were taken by Mack-Cali to investigate the matter and prevent its reoccurrence. Therefore, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s granting of summary judgment and found that the commercial landlord was not liable for death due to water-borne Legionnaires disease because no duty was owed to the plaintiff because there was no foreseeability.


 

 
Home      About the Firm      Practice Areas      Attorney Profiles       News      Contact the Firm      Legal Links      Directions
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © 2003 by Braff, Harris, & Sukoneck All rights reserved.